Package: libqt5webenginecore5
Version: 5.15.15+dfsg2-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: 2oa89y...@mozmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
The package libqt5webenginecore5 cannot be installed through apt
anymore, on debian sid, because of an unresolved dependency on
qtbase-abi-5-15-10.
Trying to install
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sat, 2024-05-18 at 11:24 +0200, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> it looks like make is not exporting the variable by default
> to the environment of subprocesses.
>
> This could be achieved by adding the below export [1].
>
> Another way would be to move the
to the list of supported architectures for the context
library and make sure it's actually being built and installed.
Tests can be performed on the porterbox perotto.debian.net.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0
it for the next package
upload?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/2024052009.99882-1-glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
the
skills. Can siridb-server/armhf please be removed from the archive?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
On 20-05-2024 11:26 a.m., Drew Parsons wrote:
Something weird happened with the slepc upload (3.20.2+dfsg1-1).
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071469
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: wireplum...@packages.debian.org
I read the wireplumber NEWS [1] when I upgraded my system. It's probably
worth mentioning it somewhere in the release-notes.
Paul
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/wireplumber/-/blob
buggy.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: file
Version: 1:5.45-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
To prevent missing setting the execution bit on php scripts in
bin:cacti, I use `file` in my d/rules to detect them. Lintian complains
that I miss a file and it's right.
paul@mulciber ~/packages/cacti/cacti $ file cli
://ci.debian.net/packages/z/zfs-linux/testing/amd64/
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
it at least ten(?) minutes after the system has been started.
Kind regards,
Paul
PS:
```
$ systemctl cat dpkg-db-backup.timer
# /usr/lib/systemd/system/dpkg-db-backup.timer
[Unit]
Description=Daily dpkg database backup timer
Documentation=man:dpkg(1)
[Timer]
OnCalendar=daily
Persistent=true
All --
::: Re: 1071007, ALL CONCERNED :::
I am associated with the upstream project.
This is a real bug. Discovered it some time last week. This seems to have
been introduced when we added the new pyproject file with a setuptools
backend.
For some unknown reason, the installed package would
.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-debversion
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=tracker
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=diffoscope
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=fakeroot
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=geoalchemy2
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
On Wed, 2024-05-15 at 10:58 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Ah, I foolishly didn't check back with the original test case. The
> root cause here, if I can call it that, is that we were calling "xz
> --list --verbose" and not specifying a second "--verbose".
That would explain it indeed.
> This has
r options
if it isn't required.
(On arm there is no default, and on riscv64 qemu's default machine is
not virtio-based, so they do need this special case)
Without a reply, we can't handle this request. Can you please follow up?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
would be expecting a bit quicker turn around on this bug if you say
yes now ;) ).
If the bug is still occurring, can you say what type of filesystem
rsync is being run on?
I'm not sure if this is the answer you're looking for, we use ext4.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
ebci's
sources.list is coming from.
I didn't check the autopkgtest code yet, but I trust your assessment
it's not lxc-templates. Let's assign to autopkgtest for further checking
Paul
PS: this reply was triggered by bug 1071185
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
': No such process
Creating group 'gnome-remote-desktop' with GID 987.
The failure lines were printed in red.
Kind regards,
Paul
On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 14:49 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> * Use "xz --list" to supplement the output when comparing .xz archives;
> essential when some underlying metadata differs. (Closes: #1069329)
> * Actually append the xz --list after the container differences, as it
>
Package: osc
Version: 0.182.1-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Upgrading osc gives Python 3.12 warnings,
the fix for this is to use raw strings:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#raw-string-notation
Preparing to unpack
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=nbd
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on
reproducible-builds [1]?
Paul
[1]
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gpaw.html
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=prettytable
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sqlmodel
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:10 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> how-can-i-help: should detect that is run by unattended-upgrades & skip
> Possible solution: skip execution if STDIN is not a TTY.
I filter and then read my unattended-upgrades mails, so
this would break my normal usage of
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=audit
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=eclib
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=praat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ukui-power-manager
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-parslet
OpenPGP_signature.asc
, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=q2-feature-table
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=tiktoken
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=click
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libcbor
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package
the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=snapraid
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=camelot-py
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=unattended-upgrades
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=multiqc
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sues that need to be
sorted
out upstream first [1].
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://github.com/OSInside/kiwi/issues/2548
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
with the latest version in stable-security
should solve the problem.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
exists, the former not.
Is this requirement newly enforced by britney?
No.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
5
days:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/britney2/policies/autopkgtest.py?ref_type=heads#L138
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:39:14 + IvanAbs wrote:
> On 2024-04-17 several of my servers running Debian 10 received an
> update for the tzdata package via Debian unattended-upgrade. However,
> this update resulted in corruption of files within the
> /usr/share/zoneinfo directory.
I, too,
eam release in Debian.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
GB total (starting off with 990 MB used),
so your test has 24 GB to use (including installing test dependencies).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rocess). Having said that, maybe we will be ready next week.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this
to src:tracker.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug
,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks
,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using
to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rapiddisk/unstable/amd64/46311856/
134s Failed command:
134s make -j64 KERNELRELEASE=6.7.12-rt-amd64 -C
/lib/modules/6.7.12-rt-amd64/build
M=/var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk
have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:24:38 +0200 Michael Weghorn wrote:
> Note: The file 'dev_README.txt' in the sources describes how to build the
> extension, but this probably cannot be followed as is, since it involves
> installing packages via "npm" in the first step (which is not in line with
> Debian's
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:47:24 + Phil Morrell wrote:
> Would be nice to see this packaged, since the native part is already
> available, under the affects package name. Note, I'm not even using this
> under KDE, it works perfectly fine under XFCE.
As I mentioned in #965386, this is easy to add
isn't RC.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 13:35 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I wonder why no QA tool reported this?
As implied by the usertags I used, the adequate tool found it:
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2013/02/23/inadequate-software/
In addition, piuparts has a test for broken symlinks too, and as
well
Package: fracatux
Version: 1.5.2~rc0-1
Severity: minor
The Homepage for fracatux currently points to a URL that has a
JavaScript based redirect to this URL, which has fracatux info:
https://educajou.forge.apps.education.fr/fracatux/
Please update the Homepage for fracatux to the new URL.
--
> let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)?
>
> sounds good
Unfortunately I missed that xorg-dev depends on libdmx-dev, so this will have to
wait until after the Bookworm release.
Let's make a bug for xorg-dev then. I'm *assuming* it's no longer needed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: onionshare-cli
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Upgrading onionshare-cli gives Python 3.12 warnings,
the right way to fix this is to use raw strings:
r am I missing something?
I am raising severity to serious then so that it can be autoremoved from
testing.
This package is a key package (because of debian-installer), so it can't
be autoremoved.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 11:48 +0200, Gerhard Rieger wrote:
> Socat is not able to do this, and there is currently no plan to
> implement this feature.
>
> However, due to the repeated requests, a script socat-mux.sh has been
> written and released with Socat 1.8.0.0 that is able to provide
>
On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 23:36 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 2020-05-10]
> > I would like to adopt this package. There is a new upstream available and
> > the
> > repository has been moved to Github with some recent activ
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
For manual pages generated by tools like help2man that run binaries to
get usage statements for conversion to manual page format, please check
that the manual pages do not contain common text indicating that the
executable or script was not able to run
Package: jbig2
Version: 0.29-2.1
Severity: normal
Usertags: help2man
The jbig2 manual page is broken. Looks like it was generated via
help2man using the binary in the build tree but without using
LD_LIBRARY_PATH so the binary could not find libraries it uses,
so jbig2 could not start, so it
Package: python3-pyasn
Version: 1.6.1-3+b4
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
When installing pyasn I get a syntax warning with Python 3.12,
the fix would be to use raw strings with Python regexes:
Package: socat
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: so...@dest-unreach.org
Forwarded: so...@dest-unreach.org
socat does not appear to have a way to send data to multiple clients of
a listening socket, which would be useful to proxy data from overloaded
servers to multiple local clients.
For example:
fan of teaching britney2 about
autodep8 internal details.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the problem at hand.
Perhaps you can spot what's wrong with this setup s.t. it does not
trigger as intended.
I hope it's clear now. Related, for future reference, we also have the
hint-testsuite-triggers [1] restriction in autopkgtest.
Paul
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest
there's an *test* dependency relation with linux, this will be tested.
Current regressions can be seen here:
https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html, look for "c-i".
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pp to display
> the intended look.
No, this is by design. The upstream developers have decided to make the user
interface as minimalistic
as possible. I'm not such a fan of the new design either, but that's just how
it looks now.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Dev
test setup for migration is a bit weird and getting it
right shouldn't be the responsibility of the test [1].
Paul
[1]
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/AutopkgtestBestPractices
(under "Don't").
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ensiveness of the guide.
We could add a statement that while more tools exist. All automated
testing of upgrades that I know of use apt-get, so that's the obvious
choice. aptitude doesn't get as much testing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: onboard
Version: 1.4.1-6
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/Onboard/Appearance.py
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
The recent upgrade of onboard triggers Python 3.12 syntax warnings,
the correct fix is to use Python's "raw"
Package: thermald
Version: 2.5.7-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete conffiles
.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
e.g.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/netplan.io/testing/s390x/45071647/
272s ==
272s ERROR: test_rename_interfaces
(__main__
unless apt-pinning asks explicitly for
versions from the source suite.
Paul
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/AutopkgtestBestPractices
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and I have adjusted the font size to something
bigger than the default).
See attachment for clarity.
Paul
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.6.15-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; P
Package: libntlm0
Version: 1.8-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/libntlm0/README
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: adequate broken-symlink
libntlm0 1.8-2 introduced a broken symlink:
/usr/share/doc/libntlm0/README -> README.md
This appears to be because upstream switched
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=3Dslurm-wlm
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/s/slurm-wlm/45786802/log.gz
96s Unpacking slurm-wlm-mysql-plugin (23.11.4-1.4) ...
96s dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-zn5wp3/17
g file images...
EE: FAIL
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
package.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
confident).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
are considered RC in testing, but because machine-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https
-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07
(yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f
at you mean?). I have triggered the test manually, so for now the
lights are green. Because those expire, I have added a hint to ignore
the failure of the old version in testing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https
1 - 100 of 26887 matches
Mail list logo
