Bug#439294: acpi-support: resume.d/62-ifup.sh is mistaken about NetworkManager

2007-08-24 Thread Uri David Akavia
On 8/24/07, Bart Samwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, August 24, 2007 01:30, Uri David Akavia wrote: *** Please type your report below this line *** /etc/resume.d/62-ifup.sh includes the lines # Kick network-manager to bring up its interfaces. (It won't do this # automatically

Bug#439294: acpi-support: resume.d/62-ifup.sh is mistaken about NetworkManager

2007-08-23 Thread Uri David Akavia
Subject: acpi-support: resume.d/62-ifup.sh is mistaken about NetworkManager Package: acpi-support Version: 0.95-2 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** /etc/resume.d/62-ifup.sh includes the lines # Kick network-manager to bring up its interfaces. (It won't do this #

Bug#333366: This bug has been reported in Gnome Bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Uri David Akavia
Hi. This bug was reported in Gnome Bugzilla, as bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143846. It was marked as WONTFIX, but I believe they implemented my suggestion, so you only meet the save as dialog once. Yours, Uri David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#351973: Acknowledgement (ifupdown: ifup -a does not activate interfaces marked with manual)

2006-02-18 Thread Uri David Akavia
Blah. My stupid mistake. Manual isn't supposed to do anything - please close this bug as INVALID Thank you and sorry about the time. Yours, Uri David Akavia On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 14:03 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian

Bug#351973: ifupdown: ifup -a does not activate interfaces marked with manual

2006-02-08 Thread Uri David Akavia
to have it activated. Running ifdown -a leaves eth0 and eth1 as active (ifconfig still displays them), and only removes the loopback device. Yours, Uri David Akavia Details follow: # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8) # The loopback interface auto lo iface lo inet