Bug#924422: update to 1.9.1

2019-03-12 Thread nusenu
Package: unbound Version: 1.9.0-2 Update to upstream release 1.9.1 to address some issues in OOOR, QNAME minimization and more. upstream announcement and changelog: https://nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2019-March/011415.html

Bug#791393: closed by Peter Palfrader <wea...@debian.org> (Bug#791393: fixed in tor 0.2.7.4-rc-1)

2015-10-25 Thread nusenu
Thanks for implementing this! There are two typos in tor-instance-create.8.txt: 18,19c18,19 < daemon. This can be useful if you want to run multiple relays or brdige < relays on a single system, of if you want to provide a hidden service in --- > daemon. This can be useful if you want to run

Bug#791393: add multi-instance systemd unit file

2015-07-04 Thread nusenu
Package: tor Severity: wishlist For users or relay operators that run multiple tor instances on a single host a multi-instance systemd service file is handy. I'm using a similar systemd unit file in my ansible-relayor configuration: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/templates

Bug#787758: 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file

2015-06-04 Thread nusenu
Do you maybe have anything installed on your upgraded system which might interfere with systemd, like cgmanager, lxc, cgroup-bin etc. upgraded-system# dpkg -l cgmanager lxc cgroup-bin dpkg-query: no packages found matching cgmanager dpkg-query: no packages found matching lxc dpkg-query: no

Bug#787758: 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file

2015-06-04 Thread nusenu
Can you find out what is different between the upgraded and fresh Debian installation? systemd version is on both (fresh and upgraded) systems 215-17, what else should I check? Can you post the complete service file you are using, please? working service file (to make it fail on upgraded

Bug#787758: 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file

2015-06-04 Thread nusenu
systemd version is on both (fresh and upgraded) systems 215-17, what else should I check? Eg. diff the list if installed packages you get via dpkg --get-selections and look for suspicouos diffs. The upgraded system has sysvinit installed, the fresh one doesn't. Both have systemd-sysv.

Bug#787758: 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file

2015-06-04 Thread nusenu
/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/4f6283e6d993e6f81a632007c823797253feee38 Note in upstream bugtracker: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89875#c2 [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/031377.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/031993

Bug#761403: CAP_KILL

2015-05-05 Thread nusenu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Arto Jantunen: Actually also CAP_KILL is needed, otherwise reload will not work. CAP_KILL is not needed, see: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-April/008759.html Feels a bit as if you are re-making my steps ;) It might make

Bug#761403: CAP_KILL

2015-05-05 Thread nusenu
entry. and maybe also the closed issues in the tracker: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+systemd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#761403: CAP_FOWNER

2015-05-04 Thread nusenu
not succeed). I was able to use ControlSocket without CAP_FOWNER. Adding CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE and CAP_CHOWN was enough in my case. See also: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-April/008638.html What tor version did you test with? thanks, nusenu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Bug#761403: CAP_FOWNER

2015-05-04 Thread nusenu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Arto Jantunen: With 0.2.6.7. Did you test both cases where /var/run/tor exists and doesn't exist? If /var/run/tor doesn't exist + ControlSocket /var/run/tor/control in torrc tor does not start with and without CAP_FOWNER: [warn] Before Tor can

Bug#761403: tor: Please install Tor's systemd unit file

2015-05-02 Thread nusenu
Hi, please consider multi-instance support when adding a systemd service file for tor. For an example see: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/templates/debian_tor%40.service (this is a template file - simply remove lines 31,36-38) CapabilityBoundingSet: Since you add

Bug#782496: is-enabled fails for legacy sysv services

2015-04-13 Thread Nusenu
/chkconfig tor --level=5 enabled echo $? 0 references: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/030652.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/030671.html https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist

Bug#782496: Acknowledgement (is-enabled fails for legacy sysv services)

2015-04-13 Thread Nusenu
duplicate Sorry I just saw: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751638 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#751638: systemctl is-enabled fails for SysV init scripts

2015-04-13 Thread Nusenu
Control: affects -1 ansible I am also annoyed by this bug because this makes Puppet thinks that the service is not enabled as it should. same with ansible -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#782479: systemd fails to merge CapabilityBoundingSet config lines

2015-04-12 Thread Nusenu
CapabilityBoundingSet = cap2 but that is not the case. Merging multiple lines manually fixed the issue for me: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/48df0a4738654ff6b0897493cf2811961550a7d6 https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/19 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ

Bug#782479: systemd fails to merge CapabilityBoundingSet config lines

2015-04-12 Thread Nusenu
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89997 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org