Bug#1009281: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

2022-08-06 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi, On 2022-07-24 21:18, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Did you get any reply? Otherwise let's go ahead with the removal. I have checked upstream's master branch and it indeed seems to contain at least some porting to Python 3. I have opened a branch on Salsa ('python3') to attempt to package it.

Bug#1009281: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

2022-07-24 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 09:21:25AM +0200 schrieb Michael Banck: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:38:21AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2022-04-11 01:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Source: cinfony > > > Version: 1.2-4 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > Your package

Bug#1009281: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1009281: Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:38:21AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-04-11 01:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: cinfony > > Version: 1.2-4 > > Severity: serious > > > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > > > - Still depends on Python 2 and

Bug#1009281: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

2022-04-10 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi, On 2022-04-11 01:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: cinfony > Version: 1.2-4 > Severity: serious > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 > - Dead upstream > - No reverse dependencies

Bug#1009281: Should cinfony be removed?

2022-04-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: cinfony Version: 1.2-4 Severity: serious Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 - Dead upstream - No reverse dependencies If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just