Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-05-12 Thread Per Lundberg
FYI: An OpenJDK bug regarding this has now been opened as well: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307977 -- Best regards, Per

Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-04-20 Thread Per Lundberg
On 2023-04-20 00:03, Vladimir Petko wrote: Oh, thank you for providing a patch for a quite annoying bug The pleasure is ours. :-) (I didn't write the patch myself but I helped out a bit with the initial debugging) Would it be possible to add a header to the patch, so that it is possible

Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-04-19 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi, Oh, thank you for providing a patch for a quite annoying bug Would it be possible to add a header to the patch, so that it is possible to see where it came from and why, e.g. ---cut--

Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-04-19 Thread Per Lundberg
On 2023-04-19 10:22, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Per Lundberg wrote: wanted to share it with you as well. One option would be to include this in Debian's set of local JDK patches Shouldn’t this be added to 11 as well? Apparently, both are affected. Good point. Yes, it

Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-04-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Per Lundberg wrote: > A short update on this. This is a known regression in more recent versions of > Java: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226919 > > One of my colleagues (thanks, Sebastian!) managed to workaround this by > patching the JDK 17 sources to make it use

Bug#1034392: Acknowledgement (tomcat9: jstack/jcmd broken for non-root users with tomcat9+jdk11 or greater)

2023-04-18 Thread Per Lundberg
Hi, A short update on this. This is a known regression in more recent versions of Java: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226919 One of my colleagues (thanks, Sebastian!) managed to workaround this by patching the JDK 17 sources to make it use plain /tmp in this case (when ns_pid ==