On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:37:50PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 14:57:23 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > If libopenraw Debian package isn't maintained in practice, maybe it
> > makes sense to drop it completely. For tumbler we can just remove the
> > dependency (and
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 14:57:23 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> If libopenraw Debian package isn't maintained in practice, maybe it
> makes sense to drop it completely. For tumbler we can just remove the
> dependency (and lose the hability to generate thumbnails for them) or
> maybe investigate
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:02:15AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Source: libopenraw
> Version: 0.1.2-0.2
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tumb...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + tumbler-plugins-extra
>
> While investigating whether libopenraw's dependency on GTK 2 can be
>
Source: libopenraw
Version: 0.1.2-0.2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: tumb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + tumbler-plugins-extra
While investigating whether libopenraw's dependency on GTK 2 can be
removed (which it can, see #967585), I noticed that the version of
libopenraw in
4 matches
Mail list logo
