So I have been reading up on flatpak documentation:
https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/ Reading this it is clear that at
least for the moment flatbox sandboxing is more of a line in the sand
than the Berlin wall. This explains why the portals config is so hard to
test.
I attach the two
Firstly by copying, pasting and editing the xsessions desktop file from
icewm to lwm I have been able to get XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=lwm into
systemd, without any other files. I can see that this is the cleanest
method. That said I infer from what I saw that every display manager is
doing its own
Simon,
Thanks for the hints. I will explore them.
(and sorry about the email title.)
Nicholas
On 02/02/2024 14:42, Simon McVittie wrote:
I've changed the subject line back to the one from the bug - I get a
*lot* of bugmail, which I usually see out-of-context, so "Investigating"
doesn't
I've changed the subject line back to the one from the bug - I get a
*lot* of bugmail, which I usually see out-of-context, so "Investigating"
doesn't really work as a reminder of what bug and what package you're
talking about. I hope that's compatible with your workflow.
On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 at
Package: lwm
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: normal
User: xdg-desktop-por...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: portals.conf
As well as being available as a window manager to integrate into some
larger environment, Lwm behaves like a very small desktop environment
in its own right, by providing a
5 matches
Mail list logo
