Bug#1056419: Can we also move uncertainties to DPT (Was: python-hug: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, thanks for Federico confirming, thus I will move the package to not need to ask again in a possible future attempt. Am Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:24:03PM +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > Hi Andreas, > > I think usage of "past" has been neutered since: > > if sys.version_info < (3,): >

Bug#1056419: Can we also move uncertainties to DPT (Was: python-hug: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-02-14 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi Andreas, I think usage of "past" has been neutered since: if sys.version_info < (3,): from past.builtins import basestring else: # Avoid importing from past in Python 3 since it utilizes the builtin # 'imp' module, which is deprecated as of Python 3.4, see #

Bug#1056419: Can we also move uncertainties to DPT (Was: python-hug: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-02-14 Thread Federico Ceratto
Hello Andreas, I'm a fan of team-maintained packages - I just set the maintainer field to DPMT in the git repo. Thanks! Federico

Bug#1056419: Can we also move uncertainties to DPT (Was: python-hug: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12)

2024-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again Federico, > Am Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:02:09PM +0100 schrieb Federico Ceratto: > > Sure, go ahead, and thank you for taking care of the bug! After you accepted python-hug I wonder whether we can also move python-uncertainties to DPT. I think the usage of past in uncertainties is