Bug#1061330: closed by Jarrah Gosbell (Re: Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs)

2024-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed -1 calamares/3.3.1-1 > > I've uploaded a new calamares about a week ago, so I think you can go > > ahead with the extensions and this bug can be closed. > Easy done. Extensions and settings-mobian were uploaded a few days ago, so > lets consider this done.

Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-02-01 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Jarrah On 2024/02/01 11:37, Jarrah Gosbell wrote: As much as I'd love Calamares to start shipping a stable ABI, I think we can probably get away here with just the rebuild. Is there an order that is required for these rebuilds? I'm currently preparing an upload for

Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-02-01 Thread Jarrah Gosbell
However, since calamares is an installer, maybe upgrades are a non-issue and all you need is to ensure rebuilds of the three packages in unstable. Speaking as the maintainer of `calamares-extensions` and `calamares-settings-mobian` I'd consider it a bug if a user had either of these

Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-01-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: calamares Version: 3.3.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi Jonathan, Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies calamares as a package shipping a library whose ABI changes on 32-bit architectures with 64-bit time_t.