Sorry for top posting.
The debian/control was modified to append Git fields, Cvs-Git and
Cvs-Browser.
Git repository is following the DEP-14 as suggested, I really
appreciated that workflow.
Changelog was improved. It reflects the all debian package modification
right now.
There's
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:02:17PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:10:53PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
>
> [DEFAULT]
> debian-branch = gnuabordo/latest
> debian-tag = gnuabordo/%(version)s
Please let me suggest to use DEP14 for branch naming:
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> d/changelog:
> > lsm (1.0.21-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> > * New upstream release (Closes: #1041221)
> > * Usrmerge compliance (Closes: #1054086)
>
> Could be more specific. "Use dh_installsystemd to install
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:10:53PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> >https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lsm
>
> I'm already using gbp, on my own repository server
>
> https://git.gnuabordo.com.br/foolsm.git/, I haven't created the salsa
> account yet.
Ah. You should have put that in the
Hi Lucas,
Hi d-mentors (there's a workflow question below),
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:16:54PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> The source builds the following binary packages:
>
> foolsm - Link connectivity monitor tool
> lsm - Link connectivity monitor tool - transitional package
>
> To
retitle 1064297 RFS: lsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool
As the source package has changed the package could be retrieve by the
following url.
The source builds the following binary packages:
foolsm - Link connectivity monitor tool
lsm - Link connectivity monitor tool -
Em 23/03/2024 13:08, Tobias Frost escreveu:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
The source package name is still being renamed, and the source package
rename is not explictly stated in the changelog.
Source package already kept old project name, only binary renamed.
I had talked about the source
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
The source package name is still being renamed, and the source package
rename is not explictly stated in the changelog.
(I think this renane shouldn't be done, to keep the history of the
package, not only the tracker but also the BTS and all the other
services working
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> > Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures
> > the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary.
>
> The upstream has changed software name but it's a good point
Em 06/03/2024 05:49, Daniel Gröber escreveu:
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures
the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary.
The upstream has changed
Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu:
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
* Package name : foolsm
Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures
the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> * Package name : foolsm
Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures
the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary.
Quick package review:
- d/postinst: I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "foolsm":
* Package name : foolsm
Version : 1.0.21-1
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL :http://lsm.foobar.fi/
* License
13 matches
Mail list logo
