On Thu, 2 May 2024 14:47:41 -0600 Karl Berry wrote:
> it looks like the LuaTeX binaries were compiled with "-g -O2", but
> running "readelf" and "objdump" shows that they're stripped, so I
> don't think that that's the issue here.
>
> FWIW, it's my understanding that what matters for
it looks like the LuaTeX binaries were compiled with "-g -O2", but
running "readelf" and "objdump" shows that they're stripped, so I
don't think that that's the issue here.
FWIW, it's my understanding that what matters for execution speed is not
the presence or absence of debug
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 17:44 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> sorry, but I don't understand!!
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2024, Max Chernoff wrote:
> > I don't think that this is TeX-related. From a Fedora 39 x86_64 host:
>
> Your data:
>
> > $ podman run --arch arm64 --rm -it --pull always
Hi Max,
sorry, but I don't understand!!
On Wed, 01 May 2024, Max Chernoff wrote:
> I don't think that this is TeX-related. From a Fedora 39 x86_64 host:
Your data:
> $ podman run --arch arm64 --rm -it --pull always debian:stable /bin/bash
[...]
> real 0m52.253s
> $ podman
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 08:44 +0900, norb...@preining.info wrote:
> at Debian they got a report that loading expl3.ltx when building formats
> is **extremely** slow when running under emulations:
>
> 1070150 at bugs.debian.org
>
> Running fmtutil output through ts (timestamp utility
Hi all,
at Debian they got a report that loading expl3.ltx when building formats
is **extremely** slow when running under emulations:
1070...@bugs.debian.org
Running fmtutil output through ts (timestamp utility from moreutils):
May 01 14:28:46 LaTeX2e <2024-06-01> pre-release-0 (develop
6 matches
Mail list logo
