Bug#1070688: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1070688: gnupg: PINENTRY_USER_DATA not passed to pinentry

2024-05-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Farblos-- On Tue 2024-05-14 21:28:05 +0200, Farblos wrote: > Should I open another issue about PINENTRY_USER_DATA not being > forwarded to the pinentry when using the gpg from package gpg-sq/ > gpg-from-sq? If yes, on what repository exactly? I would report it at

Bug#1070688: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1070688: gnupg: PINENTRY_USER_DATA not passed to pinentry

2024-05-14 Thread Farblos
Hi Daniel, On 2024-05-08 19:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: thanks for taking care about this in general and this one: > Thanks, i've reported this part upstream: > https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg/-/issues/74 in particular. Should I open another issue about

Bug#1070688: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1070688: gnupg: PINENTRY_USER_DATA not passed to pinentry

2024-05-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: affects 1070688 + gpg-from-sq apt Hi Farblos, all-- Thanks for this detailed bug report (https://bugs.debian.org/1070688). I'm a bit confused about the following: On Wed 2024-05-08 11:07:28 +0200, Farblos wrote: > Never mind. During one of the last t64 upgrade orgies package gpg-sq