Hi Farblos--
On Tue 2024-05-14 21:28:05 +0200, Farblos wrote:
> Should I open another issue about PINENTRY_USER_DATA not being
> forwarded to the pinentry when using the gpg from package gpg-sq/
> gpg-from-sq? If yes, on what repository exactly?
I would report it at
Hi Daniel,
On 2024-05-08 19:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
thanks for taking care about this in general and this one:
> Thanks, i've reported this part upstream:
> https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg/-/issues/74
in particular.
Should I open another issue about
Control: affects 1070688 + gpg-from-sq apt
Hi Farblos, all--
Thanks for this detailed bug report (https://bugs.debian.org/1070688).
I'm a bit confused about the following:
On Wed 2024-05-08 11:07:28 +0200, Farblos wrote:
> Never mind. During one of the last t64 upgrade orgies package gpg-sq
3 matches
Mail list logo