Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2023-04-20 Thread Santiago Vila
El 20/4/23 a las 14:15, Askar Safin escribió: Yes, current situation breaks bash-completion. Moreover, it breaks bash-completion in standard debian images for docker. Because in this images you enter the container as root via non-login shell. So, bash-completion in docker simply doesn't work.

Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2023-04-20 Thread Askar Safin
Yes, current situation breaks bash-completion. Moreover, it breaks bash-completion in standard debian images for docker. Because in this images you enter the container as root via non-login shell. So, bash-completion in docker simply doesn't work. So, please, copy /etc/skel/.bashrc to

Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2022-07-06 Thread Philipp Matthias Hahn
Package: base-files Version: 11.1+deb11u3 Followup-For: Bug #275623 X-Debbugs-Cc: Gabriel F. T. Gomes Dear Maintainer, the current behavior is very inconsistent in regards to `bash_completion`: - if you login as user `root` on the console or via `ssh` and get an *interactive login shell*,

Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2010-04-21 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi. What's the status on this? I'd also say root's .profile/.bashrc should be rather empty per default, a user can still copy the files from bash's /etc/skel/-stuff if he wants. But another thing. Although bash is required/essential, I guess: base-files should be rather neutral on the used

Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2005-04-18 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, what's the status of this wishlist item? Any chance to get it into the official package? Thanks, Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#275623: sync root's .bashrc and .profile with bash's skeletons

2005-04-18 Thread Santiago Vila
what's the status of this wishlist item? Any chance to get it into the official package? If I had to decide right now what to do about this bug, I would probably close it. Policy says dotfiles should be as empty as possible. Asking that root's dotfiles have things that they should not have to