At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:19:57 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
Given that other packages may in the future begin to depend on this
interface, I think this should really just be done as a shlibdeps bump.
I investigated this problem, and finally I decided to bump up shlib
vers because (1) it seems
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:13:49 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
Bastian Blank wrote:
Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
problems may the different glibc
I forgot to say that if we use schedutils compiled with glibc
2.3.2.ds1-21 (using new sched_{get,set}affinity) + glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21
runtime libraries:
bash-2.05b# ./taskset
taskset version 1.3.4
...
But if we use schedutils compiled with glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 + glibc
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:30:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
OK, I put the patch. Currently I found the problem about schedutils.
Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
sched_setaffinity interface (which has GLIBC_2.3.4), schedutils has to
depend on glibc =
At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:35:29 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:30:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
OK, I put the patch. Currently I found the problem about schedutils.
Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
sched_setaffinity interface
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:30:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
OK, I put the patch. Currently I found the problem about schedutils.
Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
sched_setaffinity
At Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:19:06 -0800,
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
from glibc 2.3.4.
I have difficulties with this patch. This patch adds new interface
glibc 2.3.4
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:32:29 +0900, GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
GOTO I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
GOTO might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
anything else,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:32:29PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:19:06 -0800,
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
from glibc 2.3.4.
I have
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:11:07 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
Investigation in the lintian lab on gluck.d.o shows that there are at
least
two packages, valgrind and schedutils, which would need to be updated to
use
the new API once this change is uploaded. Unfortunately, the data in
At Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:46:51 -0700,
David Mosberger wrote:
GOTO I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
GOTO might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
anything else, though. We
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:04:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
The problem I concerned is the symbol GLIBC_PRIVATE is defined as
GLIBC_2.3.4, not the current symbol GLIBC_2.3.3. I'm not certain this
change does not cause any problems.
It is a chain of version definitions. But binaries only
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:04:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:46:51 -0700,
David Mosberger wrote:
GOTO I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
GOTO might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
Well, yes, schedutils probably
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
Bastian Blank wrote:
Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
which may really cause problems here as ld.so is not effected. (See this
as a small part of the
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
Bastian Blank wrote:
Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
which may really cause
tags 297769 patch
thanks
The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
from glibc 2.3.4.
Bastian
--
Phasers locked on target, Captain.
diff -ruN glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/changelog glibc-2.3.2.ds1.new/debian/changelog
--- glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/changelog2005-03-24
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
from glibc 2.3.4.
Investigation in the lintian lab on gluck.d.o shows that there are at least
two packages, valgrind and schedutils, which would need to be updated
17 matches
Mail list logo
