Le mardi 3 octobre 2006 07:09, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
However, I am still unable to get *any* reasonable output from this
input for your version of par. There may be something wrong in my
settings so I am sending you my environment variables and the output
of par jez.out kapil.out.
Hello,
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le mardi 3 octobre 2006 07:09, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
However, I am still unable to get *any* reasonable output from this
input for your version of par. There may be something wrong in my
settings so I am sending you my environment
Le mardi 3 octobre 2006 11:02, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
[...]
Nevertheless, option 'g' shouldn't produce this. It is a bug. I try
to correct it today.
Thanks for this. Yes. It works now. As you say the problem is with
the character tests in
Le samedi 16 septembre 2006 03:22, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le Ven 15 septembre 2006 9:14, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
[...]
2. From the 'par' built by you as well as the one built by me I
am unable to get the 'correct' output for
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le samedi 16 septembre 2006 03:22, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
I would be grateful if you would download the text given by the
original submitter in the bug report and check that your version
of par manages to format it correctly. I
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le Ven 15 septembre 2006 9:14, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
[...]
2. From the 'par' built by you as well as the one built by me I am
unable to get the 'correct' output for the sample file that was
submit by the original submitter of the
Le Sam 16 septembre 2006 3:22, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le Ven 15 septembre 2006 9:14, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
[...]
2. From the 'par' built by you as well as the one built by me I am
unable to get the 'correct' output for the
Dear Jérôme,
Thanks for your effort and sorry for the long silence.
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
Le mardi 1 août 2006 15:30, Jérôme Pouiller a écrit :
ok, it was a stupid bug:
In par.c:719:
wchar_t ch;
should be
char ch;
this bug not appear in -O0.
I have updated
Le mardi 1 août 2006 15:30, Jérôme Pouiller a écrit :
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 13:04, Mohammed Adnène Trojette a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
It works well for me too. Great! I don't know what was the
problem, but this version seems OK to me.
It
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 13:04, Mohammed Adnène Trojette a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
It works well for me too. Great! I don't know what was the problem,
but this version seems OK to me.
It seems I was too fast. It still freeze when I launch it in vim.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
It works well for me too. Great! I don't know what was the problem, but
this version seems OK to me.
It seems I was too fast. It still freeze when I launch it in vim.
It works well on command line.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Le mardi 11 juillet 2006 17:57, Mohammed Adnène Trojette a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Please could upload a patched version of par in experimental, even
if upstream has not integrated the patch yet?
Just for information, with par rebuilt with your patch,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
How did you build it?
wget, apt-get source, patch, pdebuild, the classics ;)
Can you send me an exemple?
Well, I don't have the package anymore.
What is your $LANG value?
% echo $LANG
fr_FR.UTF-8
What is the behaviour? Is it crash?
It froze.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
- Forwarded message from Adam M. Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:37:59 +
From: Adam M. Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add multibyte support
Jezz [EMAIL
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Please could upload a patched version of par in experimental, even if
upstream has not integrated the patch yet?
Just for information, with par rebuilt with your patch, par did not work
any longer.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
- Forwarded message from Adam M. Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:37:59 +
From: Adam M. Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add multibyte support
Jezz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this patch could be added to par
16 matches
Mail list logo
