On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 16:18 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 21:38 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I don't understand what they mean by dynamic libraries either. I
believe this is
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I'm only generating 'shared' libraries, and not (yet) packaging Python
bindings (didn't even know they exist).
Well, the official PETSc Python bindings (I think) require the 'dynamic'
libraries in order to compile. I'm CCing this to someone who
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I'm only generating 'shared' libraries, and not (yet) packaging Python
bindings (didn't even know they exist).
Well, the official PETSc Python bindings (I think) require the 'dynamic'
libraries in order
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 21:38 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I don't understand what they mean by dynamic libraries either. I
believe this is their mechanism for runtime loading of libraries as
needed,
Hello and apologies for the long delay (I've been out of the country for
the better part of a month),
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 21:38 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I've put a lot of time into customizing the bmake system to work with
other Debian
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I've put a lot of time into customizing the bmake system to work with
other Debian packages and build on all arches, and BuildSystem came up
sometime after the start of the sarge freeze process a year ago, so I
decided to postpone using it until
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello and apologies for the delay,
I'm in the process of packaging PETSc 2.3.0, which I anticipate
completing by the end of next week. The main reason I didn't get it
done for sarge was the new configuration system, which was mandated
starting
Hello,
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 02:21 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello and apologies for the delay,
I'm in the process of packaging PETSc 2.3.0, which I anticipate
completing by the end of next week. The main reason I didn't get it
done for
Hello and apologies for the delay,
I'm in the process of packaging PETSc 2.3.0, which I anticipate
completing by the end of next week. The main reason I didn't get it
done for sarge was the new configuration system, which was mandated
starting with 2.2.1...
I'll close this bug when it's done.
Hi,
I've been trying to package PETSc 2.2.1 for Debian. It hasn't been easy. I
tried using your 2.2.0 packages, but had difficulty understanding all the
details, so opted to do packaging from scratch.
Test packages are at
deb http://www.cbcb.duke.edu/~faheem/debian/ ./
deb-src
10 matches
Mail list logo
