Noèl Köthe wrote:
Am Montag, den 12.06.2006, 15:17 -0700 schrieb Don Armstrong:
Hello Hrvoje and Mauro,
I understand and agree with the reasoning behind removing the GPL as
the invariant section; but why also remove the GFDL as an invariant
section?
That's just because having the GFDL as an
Am Montag, den 12.06.2006, 15:17 -0700 schrieb Don Armstrong:
Hello Hrvoje and Mauro,
I understand and agree with the reasoning behind removing the GPL as
the invariant section; but why also remove the GFDL as an invariant
section?
That's just because having the GFDL as an invariant
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I understand and agree with the reasoning behind removing the GPL as
the invariant section; but why also remove the GFDL as an invariant
section?
That's just because having the GFDL as an invariant section is a null
op; the GFDL itself already requires
Just wanted to touch bases with you again to make sure that what we
are requesting was reasonably clear, and the reasoning behind it was
understandable.
If you have any additional questions, please let me know.
Just in case it was lost, I suggest changing:
Permission is granted to copy,
I understand and agree with the reasoning behind removing the GPL as
the invariant section; but why also remove the GFDL as an invariant
section?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Summary: The issue with wget.texi is that the GNU GPL is an Invariant
Section; since the GNU GPL cannot be modified anyway, this just forces
gpl.texi to always be distributed with wget.texi, even when you're
just distributing the manual.
The GPL text
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the
GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess
that's a valid concern.
Yes, that's the issue.
Including the text of the GPL in Wget's manual serves the purpose of
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the
GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess
that's a valid concern.
Yes, that's the issue.
I see. But that's still
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the
GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess
that's a valid concern.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Including the text of the GPL in Wget's manual serves the purpose
of explaining Wget's copying terms to the user. As such, it seems
pertinent regardless of whether Wget is actually
Summary: The issue with wget.texi is that the GNU GPL is an Invariant
Section; since the GNU GPL cannot be modified anyway, this just forces
gpl.texi to always be distributed with wget.texi, even when you're
just distributing the manual.
The solution is to change with the Invariant Sections
11 matches
Mail list logo
