Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 336567 important thanks On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 + Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-10 Severity: serious ^^^ I dare lower this to important, as I believe it does not

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 336567 important thanks On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 + Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-10 Severity: serious

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 336567 important thanks On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 + Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-10 Severity: serious

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:27:42 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 + Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ie. for filesystem, try

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:34 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, using debconf is packaging. Well, i disagree You are makind debconfification much more complicated than it really needs to be :) Yaird is available for redhat as

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:53:25PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:27:42 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:03:23 +

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:34 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, using debconf is packaging. Well, i disagree You are makind debconfification much more

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-11-01 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:34 +0100 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, using debconf is packaging. Well, i disagree You are makind debconfification

Bug#336567: postinst fails runnng modprobe on 'ext3,ext2'

2005-10-31 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Package: yaird Version: 0.0.11-10 Severity: serious I have an /etc/fstab with lines of the form: /dev/hda2 / ext3,ext2 errors=remount-ro 0 1 ie. for filesystem, try ext3 first, if this cannot be done, use ext2. Recent versions of mount understand this syntax, but