Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

2006-12-22 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be documented in the RN too. Indeed. I also noticed that during a regular kernel update lilo is not always called. That's probably a bug in kernel-package even if it is

Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

2006-12-22 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Jens Seidel said: On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be documented in the RN too. Indeed. I also noticed that during a regular kernel update lilo is not always called.

Bug#396422: Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

2006-12-22 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 02:46:44PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Jens Seidel said: On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be documented in the RN too. Indeed. I also noticed

Bug#396422: Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

2006-12-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well. Hi, On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:52:02 +0100, Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: OK, I added #396422 to the To: line. Please note that I did not compile the kernel packages on

Bug#337779: marked as done (release-notes do not suggest re-running lilo)

2006-12-21 Thread Frans Pop
reopen 337779 thanks That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be documented in the RN too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]