On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be
documented in the RN too.
Indeed. I also noticed that during a regular kernel update lilo is not
always called. That's probably a bug in kernel-package even if it is
This one time, at band camp, Jens Seidel said:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be
documented in the RN too.
Indeed. I also noticed that during a regular kernel update lilo is not
always called.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 02:46:44PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jens Seidel said:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be
documented in the RN too.
Indeed. I also noticed
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well.
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:52:02 +0100, Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK, I added #396422 to the To: line. Please note that I did not
compile the kernel packages on
reopen 337779
thanks
That this is now documented in lilo does not mean it should not be
documented in the RN too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo