Hello listmasters,
I believe that we have settled all the issues regarding the request for
creation of debian-kernel-devel. In spite of that, no comments from
listmasters have been received since April 17th, and no visible action has
been taken. Is there still some kind of showstopper?
Best
Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the
day
it is not that important.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:52:27PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
debian-kernel-bugs ?
If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is
by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy
be
confusing.
The point is to *keep* d-k the
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
A good point, still i worry, debian-kernel doesn't sound like a bug mailing
list, so newcomers may be surprised.
It is not intended as a bug-only mailing list. d-k will still remain a
primary point of contact for the kernel team for users. And
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are
drowning in bug
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
--
BOFH excuse #121:
halon system went off and killed the operators.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
