Bug#377390: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#377390: (no subject)

2008-08-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:04:42PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: >Hi Jonas: > >It's for DKMS (which has an ITP in progress right now). It's a pretty >straightforward snippet that just installs a skeleton file inside >modprobe.d to work with when DK

Bug#377390: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#377390: (no subject)

2008-08-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:40:39PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: >I've got an improvement to package that i'm maintaining that would >benefit from adding this call. Is there a particular reason *against* >it? I don't see how adding a call would be d

Bug#377390: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#377390: (no subject)

2008-08-18 Thread Mario Limonciello
Hi Jonas: It's for DKMS (which has an ITP in progress right now). It's a pretty straightforward snippet that just installs a skeleton file inside modprobe.d to work with when DKMS runs. Here's the commit: http://linux.dell.com/git/?p=dkms.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ad61d6a85c3d2cf0d77ef2417d85fd718d21

Bug#377390: (no subject)

2008-08-18 Thread Mario Limonciello
I've got an improvement to package that i'm maintaining that would benefit from adding this call. Is there a particular reason *against* it? I don't see how adding a call would be detrimental to the packaging. -- Mario Limonciello *Dell | Linux Engineering* [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Desc