Bug#383791: checkstyle: source code missing for emma.jar?

2007-01-11 Thread Frank Küster
severity 383791 serious thanks Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > severity 383791 normal > thanks > > Hi, > > emma-coverage is now in Debian, so I lower the severity accordingly. That's no reason for downgrading the severity. , http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt | 1. DFS

Bug#383791: checkstyle: source code missing for emma.jar?

2007-01-11 Thread Marcus Better
severity 383791 normal thanks Hi, emma-coverage is now in Debian, so I lower the severity accordingly. If the tarball contains jars (other than checkstyle itself) they should probably be removed, and the orig tarball be rebuilt with a "+dfsg" suffix. Marcus pgprWE8zsBYbC.pgp Description: PG

Bug#383791: checkstyle: source code missing for emma.jar?

2006-09-02 Thread James Westby
Hi, It appears as if emma is only used for a code coverage target in the build file, and as such can be happily disabled. Then the jars can be removed. Does the same occur for the commons-* jars as well? They are in the Build-Depends, so it appears that the intent is to use external ones. Shou

Bug#383791: checkstyle: source code missing for emma.jar?

2006-08-19 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: checkstyle Version: 4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks DFSG #2 I just noticed that checkstyle_4.1.orig.tar.gz includes checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar which according to unzip -l checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar includes e.g. com/vladium/emma/instr/InstrProcessorST.class b