Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread निशांत / Nishant
Hi, On 7/2/07, Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe this is useful to the next guy installing Etch (or some other post-2.6.16 kernel) on a Blade 150 (or 100). Can you confirm that with a 2.6.16 kernel the problem is not reproducible? But now I am facing the problem with

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-01 Thread Thomas Köllmann
Hi, Emanuele! Sorry for the late reply -- I moved, switched jobs, started a new and much better life... :-) Emanuele Rocca wrote: Hello Thomas, * Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]: On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-05-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Thomas, * Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]: On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-17 Thread Thomas Köllmann
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it and report back. Ok, thanks; I did, and xorg is working fine. You have to set

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
severity 403364 important thanks Hi Thomas, On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 06:05:52PM +0100, Thomas Koellmann wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64 Version: 2.6.18-7 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Thomas Köllmann
Hi, Jurij! On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:58:55 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to 'important' for now. Sure, whatever you feel is in order. Do you have more

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote: No, only the onboard ATI card: atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33) [0x4752 rev 0x27] atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 235 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x56

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Thomas Köllmann
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:58 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote: atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33) [0x4752 rev 0x27] atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 235 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK Console:

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 16 December 2006 17:58, Jurij Smakov wrote: Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to 'important' for now. I'm also CC'ing this message to the debian-sparc mailing list to ask whether anybody else

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:55:13PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote: Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e. instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type Linux video=atyfb:off Yes, that works. Does this have any drawbacks regarding the use

Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jim Watson
On 17/12/2006, at 5:55 AM, Thomas Köllmann wrote: On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:58 -0800 Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e. instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type Linux video=atyfb:off Yes, that works.