Bug#424883: poor image quality compared to upstream's version

2007-06-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/06/2007): Hi Cyril, Hi Harald, I would suggest to keep the BTS on CC. Here is the output for using -v: sure, sorry for that, but I had to re-send some mails due to some MAILER-DAEMONs I received, and bounce them, forgetting the Cc's. Anyway, about our

Bug#424883: poor image quality compared to upstream's version

2007-06-17 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Cyril, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi again, does the following file contain an libgvplugin_pango.so.3 cairo entry? /usr/lib/graphviz/config It says: : : libgvplugin_pango.so.3 cairo { render { } textlayout { } loadimage { } } Looks pretty

Bug#424883: poor image quality compared to upstream's version

2007-06-17 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Cyril, I would suggest to keep the BTS on CC. Here is the output for using -v: % dot -Tgif -v -o mysandbox1.gif digraph The plugin configuration file: /usr/lib/graphviz/config was successfully loaded. render : canon cmap cmapx dia dot fig gd gd2 gif hpgl

Bug#424883: poor image quality compared to upstream's version

2007-06-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi again, does the following file contain an libgvplugin_pango.so.3 cairo entry? /usr/lib/graphviz/config Due to an upstream (reported and now fixed) bug, the pango plugin is built but might miss some configuration. If such an entry is lacking, could you please try and run dot -c (as root),

Bug#424883: poor image quality compared to upstream's version

2007-05-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tag 424883 pending block 424883 by 422859 thanks Hi, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/05/2007): I don't want to complain, but there seems to be some quality difference between the output generated by Debian's dot and upstream's version. See the attachments, for example. Yeah, I'm aware of