Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi John, Martin Ziegler schrieb am Sat 02. Jun, 10:54 (+0200): Package: jed Version: 1:0.99.18+dfsg.1-6 Severity: normal jed works properly, except it starts with the warning ***Warning: Executable compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006 Why did you add this check to main? Do

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread John E. Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:42:40 +0200, Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jed works properly, except it starts with the warning =20 ***Warning: Executable compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006 Why did you add this check to main? Do you have any reason to recommend an update? Because

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* John E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-03 13:51]: On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:42:40 +0200, Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jed works properly, except it starts with the warning =20 ***Warning: Executable compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006 Why did you add this check to

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi John, John E. Davis schrieb am Sun 03. Jun, 13:51 (-0400): On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:42:40 +0200, Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jed works properly, except it starts with the warning =20 ***Warning: Executable compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006 Why did you add this

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread John E. Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:00:01 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In order to circumvent this problem, we could force jed in Debian to depend on libslang2 (= 2.0.7). For now, the jed package depends on libslang2 (= It seems to me that if jed was compiled against 2.0.7, then the

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* John E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-03 16:57]: On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:00:01 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In order to circumvent this problem, we could force jed in Debian to depend on libslang2 (= 2.0.7). For now, the jed package depends on libslang2 (= It

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* John E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-03 16:57]: On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:00:01 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Should we ask the slang2 maintainer to bump the version number of the shlibs file? You mean to = 2.0.7? Yes. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-03 Thread Jörg Sommer
John E. Davis schrieb am Sun 03. Jun, 16:57 (-0400): On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:00:01 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In order to circumvent this problem, we could force jed in Debian to depend on libslang2 (= 2.0.7). For now, the jed package depends on libslang2 (= It seems

Bug#427166: jed: compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006

2007-06-02 Thread Martin Ziegler
Package: jed Version: 1:0.99.18+dfsg.1-6 Severity: normal jed works properly, except it starts with the warning ***Warning: Executable compiled against S-Lang 20007 but linked to 20006 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,