Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This fork bomb issue hit me on a dist-upgrade from etch to pre-lenny
now. Would you please mark this as release-critical, because that's
what it is?
Could you please use reportbug, using its follow up function? As you
might have noticed, this bug is
This fork bomb issue hit me on a dist-upgrade from etch to pre-lenny
now. Would you please mark this as release-critical, because that's
what it is?
Thank you,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My current opinion is to hack update-fontlang and hard-code xmltex and
jadetex specifics into the the code, something like if
10texlive-latex-base.cnf is not present, do not include xmltex and
jadetex snippets, finished.
That is a quick and dirty
clone 427562 -1
reassign 427562 tex-common
retitle -1 Possible forkbomb: mktexfmt loops because (pdf)TeX tries a base
format
severity -1 important
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
How do we continue with this bug. It seems to be the last really open RC
bug of the texlive
# reassign 427562 tex-common
notfound 427562 2007-11
found 427562 1.0.1
found 427562 1.7
thanks
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Hi,
I have been bitten by this bug too. However, appart of jadetex, I've
had to desinstall xmltex as well (the symptoms were similar). After
this, I've been able to install texlive-base-bin. I've installed
jadetex and xmltex afterwards without problems.
I thought it would be worth mentioning
Francesc Altet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been bitten by this bug too. However, appart of jadetex, I've
had to desinstall xmltex as well (the symptoms were similar). After
this, I've been able to install texlive-base-bin. I've installed
jadetex and xmltex afterwards without
Hi all!
How do we continue with this bug. It seems to be the last really open RC
bug of the texlive packages (a side the etch-ignore and dummy bugs).
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
An alternative would be to teach fmtutil about depending formats and
let it skip a format if there is
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
But why is texlive-latex-base not configured AND jadetex.postinst is
run??? THis is out of my understanding?
Slowly unfolds the mystery.
I assume the following:
- we are upgrading from texlive 2005, it can only happen at this time
- furthermore,
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
Slowly unfolds the mystery.
One more addition. We never found this in our tests because we always
tried upgrading from etch where jadetex was upgraded at the same time,
so the .cnf file was not included in the texlive-base-bin.postinst
fmtutil-sys
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So AFAIS the only solution to this is that we go back to the hack of NOT
preloading the latex format, but including the stuff in the .ini files.
Because jadetex depends on texlive-latex-base we can be sure that the
respective files are already
The version of texlive being upgraded from was:
2007-06-04 16:10:11 upgrade texlive-base-bin 2005.dfsg.2-12 2007-11
The version of jadetex on the system is 3.13-8, and it is fully
installed and configured.
Just to make sure... Does anyone need anything else from me on this
right now?
-- John
Hi John!
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
Just to make sure... Does anyone need anything else from me on this
right now?
No, thanks a lot. Thanks to your cooperation we found the reason of the
bug. We hope to get it fixed soon.
For now, please purge jadetex, then do the upgrade,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:01:31PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi John!
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
Just to make sure... Does anyone need anything else from me on this
right now?
No, thanks a lot. Thanks to your cooperation we found the reason of the
bug. We hope to
Hi Frank!
(Taking John from the discussion)
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
So AFAIS the only solution to this is that we go back to the hack of NOT
preloading the latex format, but including the stuff in the .ini files.
Because jadetex depends on texlive-latex-base we can be sure
15 matches
Mail list logo
