Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know
>> it is deprecated?
>
> To help Debian ConTeXt users, because etch will be used for perhaps
> two years (and longer by people who then run it as 'oldstable').
OK.
[...]
> Meanwh
> So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know
> it is deprecated?
To help Debian ConTeXt users, because etch will be used for perhaps
two years (and longer by people who then run it as 'oldstable').
> 2. Anyway, I fail to see what you want us to do, since the context
>
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree. Putting lmodern in Recommends for context means: "unless you
> know what you are doing, if you install context, then you also have to
> install lmodern". Consequently, if people follow this policy, they will
> always install lmodern alongside
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know
>> it is deprecated?
>
> Because context doesn't have the bug, but texlive-context has it. And I
> think it should be even serious.
Okay, but texlive-context is dead, so this bug is
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu
>> gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'.
>
> So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know
> i
> texlive-context is an old package. In unstable, it has been replaced
> by context, which depends on lmodern (>= 1.01).
I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu
gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'.
> apt-get is not a tool for newbies. If you don't i
Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu
> gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'.
So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know
it is deprecated?
>> apt-get is not a tool for newbie
Hi,
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> Installing 'lmodern' fixes the errors, because it provides those
> missing tfm files. So texlive-context should depend on lmodern, not
> merely recommend lmodern. Without lmodern, I think the package is
> totally unusable.
texlive-context is an old package. In unsta
Package: texlive-context
Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1
Severity: important
This minimal test.tex ConTeXt example fails when run with
'texexec --pdf test.tex' (in Debian 'etch'):
\starttext
\input tufte
\stoptext
Here is the first error (the remainder are similar):
kpathsea: Running mktextfm ec
9 matches
Mail list logo
