Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
>>> config/suites file ?
>>>
>>> Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid
On Monday 08 October 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on
> invocation and it will see that testing currently is lenny and use
> that.
I think it does.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ my-pbuilder-unstable.sh create
W: /home/rrs/.pbuilderrc does no
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:12:12AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
> config/suites file ?
Yes. It needs to get the Release file before setting up the parts which
needs to know the codename. The code which did that was removed
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
>> config/suites file ?
>>
>> Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
>>
>> Ritesh
>
> Does it matter anywhere? You can us
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
> config/suites file ?
>
> Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
>
> Ritesh
Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on
invocation and it
Hi,
Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
config/suites file ?
Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: This is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
