On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:30:11PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Either it should assign in both cases or neither.
As far as POSIX is concerned, it defers to ISO C on this. The
semantics in ISO C is quite clear, that is, the assignment should
not occur.
Sounds convincing to me. I think there's
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:35:42AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Yes.
Based on the contents of tests/arith.t, I'm wondering if this is somehow
intentional.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:45:14AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:35:42AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Yes.
Based on the contents of tests/arith.t, I'm wondering if this is somehow
intentional.
I've tested every other shell and they all disagree with posh,
except pdksh :)
Package: posh
Version: 0.5.7
Severity: normal
I'm in the process of implementing assignment/conditional operator
support in dash. I noticed that posh/pdksh has an anomaly with the
conditional operator in that both arguments seem to be evaluated.
POSIX defers to ISO C on this which forbids the
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:21:31PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the process of implementing assignment/conditional operator
support in dash. I noticed that posh/pdksh has an anomaly with the
conditional operator in that both arguments seem to be evaluated.
POSIX defers to ISO C on
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:32:08PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
Putting brackets around x = 3 seems to fix it so this could be
a parse error.
Parentheses, I assume.
Yes.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:
6 matches
Mail list logo
