Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 23:35 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.1.2008, at 17.28, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 05:07 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
I think you missed my question on O_APPEND though?
Oh, sorry...
O_APPEND is supported for normal writes,
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:50 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hi Trond,
I suspect you and Timo are coming at this from different angles, and I
think Timo's angle is closer to what I was thinking of when I asked my
question. What I'm wondering about is this: two naive programs that use
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:50 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hi Trond,
I suspect you and Timo are coming at this from different angles, and I
think Timo's angle is closer to what I was thinking of when I asked my
question. What I'm wondering about is this: two naive
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 05:07 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
I think you missed my question on O_APPEND though?
Oh, sorry...
O_APPEND is supported for normal writes, but not for O_DIRECT writes.
The reason for this is that the NFS protocol does not have the
equivalent of an atomic 'append()' RPC
On 5.1.2008, at 17.28, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 05:07 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
I think you missed my question on O_APPEND though?
Oh, sorry...
O_APPEND is supported for normal writes, but not for O_DIRECT writes.
The reason for this is that the NFS protocol does
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 23:35 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.1.2008, at 17.28, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 05:07 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
I think you missed my question on O_APPEND though?
Oh, sorry...
O_APPEND is supported for normal writes, but not for
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 11:10 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hi Trond,
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:55 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hey Trond,
Would you take a quick look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453946
Do you have some insights on
On Jan 4, 2008 10:41 PM, Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 11:10 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hi Trond,
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:55 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hey Trond,
Would you take a quick look at
Hi Trond,
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:55 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hey Trond,
Would you take a quick look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453946
Do you have some insights on this? What should the man page say about
current support of O_EXCL on
Hey Trond,
Would you take a quick look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453946
Do you have some insights on this? What should the man page say about
current support of O_EXCL on NFS?
Cheers,
Michael
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Kerrisk
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:55 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Hey Trond,
Would you take a quick look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453946
Do you have some insights on this? What should the man page say about
current support of O_EXCL on NFS?
Cheers,
Michael
Hi
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.64-1
Severity: normal
O_EXCL is broken on NFS file systems is wrong. Rather it should be O_EXCL
doesn't work on NFSv2 file systems. And since pretty much everyone uses at
least NFSv3 nowadays I don't think it's worth mentioning the link()
workaround anymore.
--
On Dec 2, 2007 3:32 PM, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.64-1
Severity: normal
O_EXCL is broken on NFS file systems is wrong. Rather it should be O_EXCL
doesn't work on NFSv2 file systems. And since pretty much everyone uses at
least NFSv3 nowadays I
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 3:32 PM, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.64-1
Severity: normal
O_EXCL is broken on NFS file systems is wrong. Rather it should be O_EXCL
doesn't work on NFSv2 file systems.
14 matches
Mail list logo