Bug#468147: Re: Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Santiago Vila [161011 01:35]: > > As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because > > util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch. > > > > Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used

Bug#468147: Re: Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

* Santiago Vila [161011 01:35]: > As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because > util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch. > > Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used by > init.d scripts, but those scripts are obsoleted by

Bug#468147: Re: Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Hello everybody. As of today, lsb-base is "less essential" than before, because util-linux no longer depends on it in stretch. Also, if I'm not mistaken, lsb-base is a shell library to be used by init.d scripts, but those scripts are obsoleted by systemd. So, it is now possible (and in fact I

Bug#468147: Re: Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Hi Russ, Raphael, Marc and dear Lintian maintainers, Le 22.02.2009 05:46, Russ Allbery a écrit : Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com writes: Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base 3.0-6 Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed? No, the problem

Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Hi everyone, Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base 3.0-6 Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed? Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com writes: Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base 3.0-6 Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed? No, the problem isn't the version of lsb-base, it's that lsb-base isn't essential and hence can't be assumed to be

Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Michal =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Ciha=C5=99?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: while reviewing some sponsored packages I noticed quite often mistake of missing dependency on lsb-base (= 3.0-6) if init script includes /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think it would be reasonable to add such check to lintian - if init

Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Hi On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:58:36 +0100 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there are some packages which use something like this: if [ -f /lib/lsb/init-functions ]; then . /lib/lsb/init-functions fi I didn't notice this so far. I just thought this would add too much

Bug#468147: Check for correct lsb-base dependency for init script functions

Package: lintian Version: 1.23.45 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi while reviewing some sponsored packages I noticed quite often mistake of missing dependency on lsb-base (= 3.0-6) if init script includes /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think it would be reasonable