On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:53:07PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
If you take a look at the code you will see that this is just a very big
cpp wrapper ;) The problem that the outcome of the test would depend on
the architecture you run lintian on remains.
What do you think about this patch? It
Hi Frank, Hi Rafael,
Frank Lichtenheld schrieb am Mon 21. Apr, 01:47 (+0200):
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-21 00:02]:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:19:32PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
C-style
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: normal
C-style comments in dpatch's patches/00list files are allowed (see, e.g.
man dpatch for an example). However, lintian wrongly complains with
dpatch-index-references-non-existant-patch for lines containing
/* comment */.
Rafael
-- System
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:19:32PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
C-style comments in dpatch's patches/00list files are allowed (see, e.g.
man dpatch for an example). However, lintian wrongly complains with
dpatch-index-references-non-existant-patch for lines containing
/* comment */.
To
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-21 00:02]:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:19:32PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
C-style comments in dpatch's patches/00list files are allowed (see, e.g.
man dpatch for an example). However, lintian wrongly complains with
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-21 00:02]:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:19:32PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
C-style comments in dpatch's patches/00list files are allowed (see, e.g.
man dpatch for an
6 matches
Mail list logo
