Sorry, long posponed email here: I'm sending it because the last
retorical questions are still relevent.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
metadata=0.9 would never work. It is a version number, not a decimal
number. metadata=0.90 is correct and totally different from
On Monday August 31, robe...@debath.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
Why specify it in the first place? I suggest to remove all metadata=
stuff from mdadm.conf. Inspect the /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf output.
I didn't.
It got added automatically... Bug?
Bug
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
Why specify it in the first place? I suggest to remove all metadata=
stuff from mdadm.conf. Inspect the /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf output.
I didn't.
It got added automatically... Bug?
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath robert$ @
mdadm is VERY touchy about the metadata= item in the /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
file.
For example I've just done an upgrade and the upgrade script put
metadata=0.9 in the file. This was not acceptable to mdadm -A only when
I changed it to metadata=0.90 was mdadm -A able to assemble the array.
also sprach Robert de Bath robe...@debath.co.uk [2009.08.30.2025 +0200]:
mdadm is VERY touchy about the metadata= item in the
/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file.
For example I've just done an upgrade and the upgrade script put
metadata=0.9 in the file. This was not acceptable to mdadm -A only
when
5 matches
Mail list logo
