Bug#499508: closed by Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#499508: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.870~rc3-0.1)

Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Something went wrong with this upload: [..] tags 499508 +pending So, version.h wasn't up-to-date in the new tarball? Curious. Good spot anyway, and thanks for uploading this extra fix. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [EMAIL

Bug#499508: closed by Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#499508: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.870~rc3-0.1)

Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 10:27 +0100 schrieb Chris Lamb: Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Something went wrong with this upload: [..] tags 499508 +pending So, version.h wasn't up-to-date in the new tarball? It was, but the Debian diff reverted the change. This is from your last upload,

Bug#499508: AW: Re: Bug#499508 closed by Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#499508: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.870~rc3-0.1)

I really don't know why, it's also not documented in the changelog. Philipp, do you know something about that change? Maybe dropping that patch from 2.0.869.2-2.1 would have fixed booting from iscsi as well, but now we already have 2.0.870-rc3 in unstable... No, that doesn't make sense to

Bug#499508: closed by Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#499508: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.870~rc3-0.1)

Found: 2.0.870~rc3-0.1 Am Dienstag, den 30.09.2008, 21:36 + schrieb Debian BTS: open-iscsi (2.0.870~rc3-0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release - Adds support for Linux 2.6.26 (Closes: #499508) * Fix redirection bashism in open-iscsi