On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
severity 500965 normal
thanks
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
and at least Yahoo is actually rejecting messages failing these kind
of
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Alexander Wirt wrote:
God no. DMARC is just broken by design. We should no in any way support it.
We don't have to support DMARC as such, it would enough if lists.debian.org
didn't send messages having DKIM signatures that do not verify.
OTOH, if we are going to boycott
severity 500965 normal
thanks
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
and at least Yahoo is actually rejecting messages failing these kind
of digital signatures.
The following text comes from
Control: retitle -1 Do not append footers to messages with DKIM headers
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
and at least Yahoo is actually rejecting
El 02/05/14 19:07, Don Armstrong escribió:
Control: retitle -1 Do not append footers to messages with DKIM headers
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and
El 02/05/14 19:07, Don Armstrong escribió:
However, an interesting alternative possibility might be to just not
attach footers to messages which contain DKIM headers, as we already do
for messages which are signed.
If you do this, I would suggest that you put the Archive info in the
header in
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hmm. Can you elaborate on that? Do you consider that if I sign a
message and you want to modify it, am I to blame that you can't modify
it? Or else: If you modify it anyway, am I to blame that the signature
does not verify anymore?
You're to blame if
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:51:43AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hmm. Can you elaborate on that? Do you consider that if I sign a
message and you want to modify it, am I to blame that you can't modify
it? Or else: If you modify it anyway, am I to
8 matches
Mail list logo
