* Eddy Petrișor [Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:54:03 +0200]:
Hello release team,
Hello, Eddy (and Mercurial maintainers).
Here are my thoughts on the issue:
- a patch for this should really get an ACK from the maintainers
- if not, you should follow the usual procedures for NMUs for RC
bugs,
Hi,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Eddy Petrișor [Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:54:03 +0200]:
Hello release team,
Hello, Eddy (and Mercurial maintainers).
Here are my thoughts on the issue:
- a patch for this should really get an ACK from the maintainers
I quickly look at your (Eddy) patch and I
No I haven't talked to them. Indeed, the quick fix I provided is not the
right solution for upstream, but it looks like a good workaround for
lenny since we're closer and closer to the release (now that D-I rc2 was
announced).
the problem ? Or even your patch ? (but I think they will prefer
Hello release team,
Mercurial's hgk extension fails to start if the configuration files of another
extension are still present after a package removal.
This is bug #513183 - hgk fails to start when hg emits warnings.
This happens under relatively common conditions (package of an extension
is
4 matches
Mail list logo