Hi Russ,
Hope you will give me some time to sleep and then write a couple more checks :)
Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
A pure filename match on the fonts I think is only certainty: possible. I
made that adjustment after committing.
At the beginning I considered downloading the .deb files to
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com writes:
At the beginning I considered downloading the .deb files to calculate
the checksums of the files, based on the analysis of Contents, but when
Paul replied to my questions I was thinking about using the file he
mentioned. I decided to implement
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Please check for *.ttf *.otf fonts in packages not named ttf-* and
otf-*. These fonts should be generally be packaged separately and
depended on because they are usually useful outside the package that
embeds them (often they are decorative fonts, which are
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com writes:
Attached mbox has two patches, one implementing
font-in-non-font-package, and the second one implementing
duplicate-font-file.
Looks like we both did the former at the same time. :)
I implemented the former check as wishlist and not
4 matches
Mail list logo
