Diederik de Haas dixit:
>and the patch proposed by Ben, more then 6 years ago, hasn't been merged.
>
>As I don't know the reason it wasn't closed last year, I won't do it, but
>maybe it's time to finally close it?
If the bug persists, it’s still a bug, so don’t close it.
Prod them occasionally.
On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:02:33 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:14:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > 2011/7/29 Moritz Mühlenhoff :
> > > We already asked you back in September 2009 to report this upstream.
> >
> > He did, precisely in September 2009:
> >
> >
hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:14:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Moritz Mühlenhoff :
> > We already asked you back in September 2009 to report this upstream.
>
> He did, precisely in September 2009:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14186
>
> He still got no
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:09:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Ben Hutchings dixit:
The use of __undefined in the BSDs predates use of it by
both Linux and GNU. (But when using this argumentation
style, we’d probably better take this upstream… except
that upstream may not be helping…)
We
2011/7/29 Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org:
We already asked you back in September 2009 to report this upstream.
He did, precisely in September 2009:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14186
He still got no response though.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Robert Millan dixit:
I can see they wouldn't be excited about it, but they might also accept
You know that there are more than one BSD, but only one glibc,
IIRC Drepper isn’t even its maintainer any more. Try persuading
for example Theo de Raadt of anything which doesn’t have any
immediate
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 18:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Robert Millan dixit:
I can see they wouldn't be excited about it, but they might also accept
You know that there are more than one BSD, but only one glibc,
IIRC Drepper isn’t even its maintainer any more.
According to
Ben Hutchings dixit:
Honestly, when resolving this I’d go for “who has the older
rights”. Maybe look at how CSUR resolves different claims to
the same part of the Unicode PUA, or something like that.
Nevertheless, thanks on picking this up.
Debian GNU/Linux is the older system; the Debian
Hi Robert,
Robert Millan wrote:
When it comes to __attibute__((__unused__)), it's just a matter of
agreeing on whether to call it __attribute_unused__ or __unused.
I don't agree. It's perfectly fine for there to be multiple names
for the thing --- the task at hand is dividing up the __*
2011/6/18 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
Hi Robert,
Robert Millan wrote:
When it comes to __attibute__((__unused__)), it's just a matter of
agreeing on whether to call it __attribute_unused__ or __unused.
I don't agree. It's perfectly fine for there to be multiple names
for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
