Hi Daniel,
On 2012-07-26 09:14, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/26/2012 04:02 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
No, the moreinfo tag is public and has a defined meaning
and can be used at the maintainers descretion, just as almost anything
else in the bts.
There are no maintainers here. Besides,
On 07/26/2012 04:02 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
No, the moreinfo tag is public and has a defined meaning
and can be used at the maintainers descretion, just as almost anything
else in the bts.
anyhow, we got the pseudo-package, so i don't know what you're actualy
'complaining' about, and
On 2012-07-20 18:31, Don Armstrong wrote:
outlook 544192 Need the proper name of the pseudopackage; debian-live is not
ideal. live.debian.org or live.debian.net?
thanks
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
after re-reading again trough this bug as i do every year that's passing
by..
as
On 2012-07-20 20:59, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
if we can't have live.debian.org without having the url first, let's
have live.debian.net then, as this is what we use since many years
consistently anywhere
On 07/26/2012 02:55 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
That doesn't justify having tagged the report moreinfo.
the maintainer (here owner@b.d.o) does not need to justify his own usage
of descriptive bug tags such as moreinfo, and can use them how he see
fit for his own best way of triaging bugs.
--
Hi Daniel,
On 2012-07-25 21:39, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/26/2012 02:55 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
That doesn't justify having tagged the report moreinfo.
the maintainer (here owner@b.d.o) does not need to justify his own usage
of descriptive bug tags such as moreinfo, and can use them how
Hi,
after re-reading again trough this bug as i do every year that's passing
by..
as the tag moreinfo suggests, what exactely is left open that you
require to know from us in order to be able to create the pseudo package?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,
outlook 544192 Need the proper name of the pseudopackage; debian-live is not
ideal. live.debian.org or live.debian.net?
thanks
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
after re-reading again trough this bug as i do every year that's passing
by..
as the tag moreinfo suggests, what exactely
On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
The last time I touched this, no one had decided what the name of the
actual pseudo package was going to be. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544192#25
why excately is 'debian-live' not ideal? we already ruled your suspicion
of
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
The last time I touched this, no one had decided what the name of the
actual pseudo package was going to be. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544192#25
why exactly is 'debian-live'
On 07/21/2012 02:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
I understand now that you aren't planning on ever wanting to use it as a
package name,
yes.
but it also means that no one else will ever be able to use it as a
package name.
that's ok.
in the past six years, we have consistently used
Don Armstrong wrote:
Please send this bug a list of the bugs (or ideally, a set of bugs
which are tagged with a specific usertag) you propose to have assigned
to the debian-live psuedopackage.
#517444
I also need a sentence which describes the type of bugs which would be
assigned to the
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Live debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please add a debian-live pseudo package in the bug tracking system in
order the debian-live team to better handle bugs that are not directly
related to either live-helper or live-initramfs.
Regards,
tag 544192 moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Daniel Baumann wrote:
please add a debian-live pseudo package in the bug tracking system
in order the debian-live team to better handle bugs that are not
directly related to either live-helper or live-initramfs.
Please send this bug a list of
14 matches
Mail list logo
