On 23/09/09 at 07:22 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/09/09 at 18:47 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other
platforms. What research did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Why are you building in a lenny chroot ?
Because I was testing before with a sid chroot, which worked and I got
confused.
So I redid a build of 9.8.4-1 in a clean chroot and ... it just worked...
Groetjes,
On 23/09/09 at 14:30 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Why are you building in a lenny chroot ?
Because I was testing before with a sid chroot, which worked and I got
confused.
So I redid a build of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Lucas,
I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other
platforms. What research did you do in this failure?
Groetjes, Peter
- --
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God,
Hi Peter,
On 22/09/09 at 18:47 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other
platforms. What research did you do in this failure?
I have done no research at all. But it's easily reproducible.
Have you actually tried to build it in a clean,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/09/09 at 18:47 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other
platforms. What research did you do in this failure?
I have done no research at all.
Package: ecl
Version: 9.8.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090907 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
7 matches
Mail list logo