Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-05-25 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi all, Am 22.05.2010 19:42, schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: > 2.6.32.12 has introduced lots of xfs bugfixes. Please try the current > 2.6.32-13 kernel from unstable. If the error can still be reproduced > it should be reported upstream at bugzilla.kernel.org Looks like my issue has been solved with

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-05-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Hi all, > > Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems: > > >xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info? > >output of: > >dpkg -l xfsdump > > Here we go... > > # dpkg -l xfsdump > Desired=Unknown/In

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-23 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Hi all, Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems: xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info? output of: dpkg -l xfsdump Here we go... # dpkg -l xfsdump Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping > to tape: > > Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim > 0x8800642fcd80 > > Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-22 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping to tape: Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim 0x8800642fcd80 Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd64 #1 Call trace: [...] ? panic+0x86/0x141 [...] ? __up_write+0x12/0x45 [...]

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-22 Thread Stephan Austermühle
No issues so far with 2.6.32. xfsdump to tape seems to work better now, i.e. no panics. I think we can close this bug. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:00:41PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you mean > 2.6.32-2-amd64? yes of course, sorry for the typo. 2.6.30 is dead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:00:41PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote: > Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you > mean 2.6.32-2-amd64? Yes, please try that version. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#556231: Bug #556231

2010-02-14 Thread Stephan Austermühle
Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you mean 2.6.32-2-amd64? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature