tag 579112 + patch
thanks
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:33:57 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
I'd still like to see this feature in debhelper, preferrably in = 9,
so I've looked at the code a bit:
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:00:04 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
I suppose extending dh_perl a bit could give a
gregor herrmann wrote:
I'd still like to see this feature in debhelper, preferrably in = 9,
so I've looked at the code a bit:
In patch 0001-dh_perl-add-S-_s_ameperl-switch-in-v9.patch I've added
a -S switch, that adds exactly these values to ${perl:Depends}, and
can be used with d/compat=9
clone 562214 -1
retitle -1 debhelper: dh_perl: substitute a dependency on the current perl
upstream version
severity -1 wishlist
submitter -1 !
reassign -1 debhelper 7.4.17
thanks
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:18:10PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| gregor herrmann, Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 02:56:52PM
-=| gregor herrmann, Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 02:56:52PM +0100 |=-
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:00:04 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
I suppose extending dh_perl a bit could give a scalable way to
require
binNMUs for selected packages when the Perl upstream version changes.
Just a new flag to substitute
(cc'ing p...@packages.d.o)
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:34:29PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
actually, this already happens. for example, libdevel-cover-perl
depends on perlapi-5.10.0. the problem with this is that the new
version of perl-base provides both perlapi-5.10.0 and perlapi-5.10.1.
so
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:00:04 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
Anyway, I'm not thrilled about dropping perlapi-5.10.0 and requiring 270
or so binNMUs just because Devel::Cover thinks it might have a problem
with a newer Perl upstream version.
It's not the only package, I remember playing with substvars
Package: libdevel-cover-perl
Version: 0.65-1
Severity: important
When running Devel::Cover, I get some unsightly warnings:
t/pod-coverage.t .. ok
t/pod.t ...
This version of Devel::Cover was built with Perl version 5.01.
It is now being run with Perl version 5.010001.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk wrote:
So we need to tighten up the Depends to match the version of Perl that
libdevel-cover-perl was compiled against.
I get these warnings too, and have always considered them more of an
annoyance than a bug. I have been thinking
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 04:09:43PM -0500, Jonathan Yu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk wrote:
So we need to tighten up the Depends to match the version of Perl that
libdevel-cover-perl was compiled against.
I get these warnings too, and have always
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:19 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 04:09:43PM -0500, Jonathan Yu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk wrote:
So we need to tighten up the Depends to match the version of Perl that
libdevel-cover-perl was compiled
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:07:33PM +, Tim Retout wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:19 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 04:09:43PM -0500, Jonathan Yu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk wrote:
So we need to tighten up the Depends to
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:16:34PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:07:33PM +, Tim Retout wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:19 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 04:09:43PM -0500, Jonathan Yu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tim Retout
12 matches
Mail list logo
