> Hi, and thanks for your detailed report, > > Unlike it may look, flyspell.el and ispell.el shipped with Debian are > those of emacs23 before FSF emacs changed from using CVS to use bzr.
Ah, OK. My fault for not checking closer. > Note that we need to modify pristine flyspell.el and ispell.el for > better integration with Debian spellchecking dictionaries and to try > having a consistent behavior from Emacs and XEmacs. Doing this in a > less intrusive way is also in my TODO list. I also didn't realize that your elisp-fu was strong; at a glance dictionaries-common looked like one of those packages that is mainly concerned with non-emacs things, but happened to include some elisp. I picked it as a test case for list-load-path-shadows bugs because it happened to be the first site-lisp load in my *Messages*. Sorry for the noise! :-) >> PS: you should use "mode: emacs-lisp", not "mode: lisp" for elisp > > Thanks for the suggestion, this has been here for long time and I > did not even notice. I noticed because C-c C-z ran lisp, not ielm :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
