tag 596097 patch
thanks
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 15:25 +0200]:
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
If we (or rather the backport.debian.org ftpmasters, I'm just trying to
convince you to provide the apt feature that is a prerequisite for
package apt
merge 596097 186767
thanks
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent users
from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the drawback of
preventing updates from installed backports. Even if our docs trys to
Hi!
* Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org [2010-09-08 18:58:05 CEST]:
On Mi, 2010-09-08 at 18:31 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
It would be great if apt would support a Flag like:
NotAutomaticButUpdates or so which pins a remote repo to 100. If
needed I can provide a patch but my C++
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 10:42 +0200]:
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent
users from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the
drawback of preventing updates from installed backports. Even if our
* Julian Andres Klode [2010-09-08 18:58 +0200]:
My opinion: It may break some applications making use of NotAutomatic
flags if you suddenly add a third type of sources (0, NotAutomatic,
NotAutomaticButUpdates). But the breakage is probably not that hard.
I don't see how this could break
On Do, 2010-09-09 at 10:42 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
package apt
merge 596097 186767
thanks
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent users
from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the drawback of
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 10:42 +0200]:
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
Beside that you will shock each lenny to squeeze changer which doesn't
read the news… or does make an upgrade with apt/lenny which doesn't
understand the new
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 15:25 +0200]:
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
.. NotAutomatic could still be set and overruled by the new flag, even
if it feels a bit ugly to do so…
Indeed, that seems to be a good solution for this.
Five years ago, when I mentioned DefaultPriority
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent users
from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the drawback of
preventing updates from installed backports. Even if our docs trys to
force users of pinning backports
On Mi, 2010-09-08 at 18:31 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent users
from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the drawback of
preventing updates from installed
10 matches
Mail list logo
