Hi Serafeim,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:28, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Hi again,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
I have a question about the patch. If I remove (not purge) c-l-c
first, I will also encounter the conflict when I
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:58:25PM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
Why would you update cl-asdf? (it has no rc bugs)
Because c-l-c repo code depends on cl-asdf 2:2.010-1, it's on mentors.
clc depends on 2:2.004-1 which is already in the archive
If you don't upload cl-asdf, please
Hi again,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 03:51, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]:
I think the ideal instead would be to keep
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]:
I think the ideal instead would be to keep lisp-confifg.lisp as a conffile,
but remove it in preinst when upgrading from versions prior to 7.0. Here's an
I've tested the patch. Do you want to make the
Hi Serafeim,
Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will
delete the file even if user has modified it.
I'm looking for the solution about that too. If you ensure your patch
is correct, would you please merge it into our git repo?
Thanks,
Des
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at
tag 601957 - pending
tag 601957 patch
thanks
Hi Desmond,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:22:17PM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will
delete the file even if user has modified it.
6.17 (lenny release) creates
tag 601957 pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU in delayed/5; feel free to override.
Cheers,
Serafeim
diff -Nurp common-lisp-controller-7.4.orig//debian/changelog
common-lisp-controller-7.4+nmu1//debian/changelog
--- common-lisp-controller-7.4.orig//debian/changelog
7 matches
Mail list logo
