On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
Thanks, I've applied a similar patch, adding defined(__arch64__) as
alternative since that seems to be defined by gcc -m64 on Debian/sparc,
whereas __sparcv9 isn't, so hopefully this will fix sparc and not break
sparc64. I'll upload the NMU in a
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 14:40:56 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
Thanks, I've applied a similar patch, adding defined(__arch64__) as
alternative since that seems to be defined by gcc -m64 on Debian/sparc,
whereas __sparcv9 isn't, so hopefully this will fix
tag 604717 pending
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:12:54 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:
Ok, after reading these FAQ entries, I am more convinnced this is
the right solution.
Q: Can you please port the diet libc to FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows?
A: No.
Q: Can I compile or use the diet libc with a
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 23:24:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Julien Cristau dixit:
The gcc -mcpu=v9 option (which, aiui, triggers the __sparc_v9__
define) is orthogonal to -m32/-m64, it specifies the target
instruction and register set, not the size of longs/pointers.
AFAICT, a 32-bit
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
Do you plan on NMUing with this patch?
I am not a DD, so I don't think I can NMU it myself. I certainly won't
object if you want to NMU it since the maintainer has been non-responsive
for the last month.
Thanks,
Ivan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:12:54 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:
tags 604717 patch
severity 604717 critital
thanks
Ok, after reading these FAQ entries, I am more convinnced this is
the right solution.
Q: Can you please port the diet libc to FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows?
A: No.
Q: Can I compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Julien Cristau dixit:
Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling
Do you plan on NMUing with this patch?
I still think this is wrong, and the other patch must be reverted
instead, even if this may fix Ivan’s symptoms. I
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 20:13:53 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Julien Cristau dixit:
Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling
Do you plan on NMUing with this patch?
I still think this is wrong, and the other patch must be reverted
instead, even if this may fix
Julien Cristau dixit:
The gcc -mcpu=v9 option (which, aiui, triggers the __sparc_v9__
define) is orthogonal to -m32/-m64, it specifies the target
instruction and register set, not the size of longs/pointers.
AFAICT, a 32-bit v9 target is called v8+ not v9.
And besides, there’s Debian/sparc64
tags 604717 patch
severity 604717 critital
thanks
Ok, after reading these FAQ entries, I am more convinnced this is the
right solution.
Q: Can you please port the diet libc to FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows?
A: No.
Q: Can I compile or use the diet libc with a compiler that is not gcc?
A: Compile:
10 matches
Mail list logo
