Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.12.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Fr, 24 Dez 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, we have to go through texlive-base.postinst step by step and check, It is not there, it is in tex-common: I adapted the postinst with loads of debug and what did I found: Well, I

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.12.10 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: On 25.12.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: Hi, It is not there, it is in tex-common: I adapted the postinst with loads of debug and what did I found: Well, I expected somthing like that. So ... what is the

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-25 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.12.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: Hi, By default, the TeX filename database is also rebuilt (with mktexlsr). ... --nohash do not run texhash ... So ... what is the solution? The simple idea would be to call updmap-sys --nohash, but on

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-25 Thread Norbert Preining
HI Hilmar! On Sa, 25 Dez 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote: I hade a short look: texhash is only called one time shortly before the end of the mkMaps function, which is only called one time at the end of the main function. This means the updmap script itself does not need an ls-R db update during

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-25 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 26 Dez 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: So that means we only have to adapt the trigger action of tex-common. What do you say about that one: Tested that code: ...cowbuilder ... Setting up texlive-base (2009-11) ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Building format(s) --all

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-24 Thread Hilmar Preusse
reassign 607857 texlive-base retitle 607857 postinst script of texlive-base creates /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R stop On 24.12.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: Hi, The question is *WHY* an ls-R file is created there, because none of *our* scripts (AFAIS) creates it, all call

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-24 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fr, 24 Dez 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote: we have to go through texlive-base.postinst step by step and check, It is not there, it is in tex-common: I adapted the postinst with loads of debug and what did I found: DEBUG 122: DEBUG 123: Running updmap-sys. This may take some time... DEBUG 124:

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
reassign 607857 tex-common tags 607857 patch thanks Hi, I've tried it with pbuilder chroot environment, installed tex-common. r...@hp115:/# ls -l /usr/local/share/ total 0 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 40 Dec 21 08:40 man drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 40 Dec 24 01:26 texmf Oops, there's texmf!

Bug#607857: texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local (proposed patch)

2010-12-23 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hideki, what are you trying to do? Why do you not try to understand what I wrote several times? Yes, we know that we create /u/l/s/texmf, this is allowed by policy. The question is *WHY* an ls-R file is created there, because none of *our* scripts (AFAIS) creates it, all call mktexlsr with a