On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 at 11:20:41 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> autoremoval won't happen due to popcon, but since everyone seems to be
> in agreement regarding removal in bullseye let's document that with RC
> severity.
Thanks, that makes sense.
There are only two surviving rdeps. kannel-sqlbox is
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 - jessie buster stretch
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:08:09PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> I think the removal of sqlite 2 is really overdue. I've just filed an
> RM bug for qsf, shall we bump this bug to RC to drop remaining rdeps
> via auto
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:05:36AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> > Filing bugs against reverse dependencies to migrate to sqlite 3 would be
> > a better start IMO.
>
> 5 years later, here is an updated status, using dak (the same tool
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Filing bugs against reverse dependencies to migrate to sqlite 3 would be
> a better start IMO.
5 years later, here is an updated status, using dak (the same tool the
ftp team would use to remove packages) rather than apt-cache
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not
compile in some new ports.
Raising severity so at the very least it gets auto-removed
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie?
The only way I can see us not shipping it is if we remove it along with
the remaining rdeps. Now is not the time to migrate them over to
sqlite3 in jessie.
Cheers,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not
compile in some new ports.
It should compile on all
Hi Julien,
2014-10-29 10:48 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33:32 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie?
The only way I can see us not shipping it is if we remove it along with
the remaining rdeps.
Hi Laszlo,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:52:02 +0100
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= g...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not
compile in some new ports.
Raising severity so at the very least it gets auto-removed from
testing and thus it does not get included in the next stable release
(it already was included in the
Package: sqlite
Version: 2.8.17-6
Severity: important
Hi,
Is this package still useful since we also have an sqlite3
package? They have the same description other than that
short description has a 3 in it.
From what I find it says that sqlite3 is compatible with
all versions. So I don't see
Hi Kurt,
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 13:02 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: sqlite
Version: 2.8.17-6
Severity: important
Hi,
Is this package still useful since we also have an sqlite3
package? They have the same description other than that
short description has a 3 in it.
From what I
12 matches
Mail list logo
