On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:03:27AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Roger Leigh]
I'm somewhat unsure what the reason for the problem is? What causes
failure when the directory is present?
I suspect NFS mounting fail. but the bug reporter need to provide more
information. But
Hello Roger and Petter!!!
Have a good year!
Thanks for your fast responses and sorry for my late reply.
El 31/12/11 07:03, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
[Roger Leigh]
I'm somewhat unsure what the reason for the problem is? What causes
failure when the directory is present?
I
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:54:33AM -0200, Ivan Baldo wrote:
El 31/12/11 07:03, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
[Roger Leigh]
I'm somewhat unsure what the reason for the problem is? What causes
failure when the directory is present?
I suspect NFS mounting fail. but the bug reporter need to
[Roger Leigh]
I'm somewhat unsure what the reason for the problem is? What causes
failure when the directory is present?
I suspect NFS mounting fail. but the bug reporter need to provide more
information. But perhaps this bug is related to the inverted logic in
the NFS mounting code that
/lib/init/bootclean.sh must remove /var/run/network/mountnfs , it is
an exception to the rule and it has to be done.
I switched to tmpfs for /var/lock and /var/run and I don't have this
problem anymore... but since that's optional users without tmpfs must
be supported.
A simple rm -rf
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:05:13PM -0300, Ivan Baldo wrote:
/lib/init/bootclean.sh must remove /var/run/network/mountnfs , it is
an exception to the rule and it has to be done.
I switched to tmpfs for /var/lock and /var/run and I don't have this
problem anymore... but since that's
6 matches
Mail list logo
