reopen 638595
thanks
AM == Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org writes:
AM it seems to fix the issue for me, the minimal testcase (lynx -dump
AM https://localhost:8443/) now works.
Did you try the test cases I listed?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
reopen 638595
thanks
AM == Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org writes:
AM it seems to fix the issue for me, the minimal testcase (lynx -dump
AM https://localhost:8443/) now works.
Did you try the test cases I listed?
No.
I don't know why the problem
# OK, so the gnutls upgrade fixed the segfaults, and the rest is a WWWOFFLE bug.
reassign 638595 wwwoffle 2.9f-2.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2011-08-27 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@gnutls.org wrote:
[...]
It is a bug introduced in 2.12.x. Does the attached patch
fix the issue?
[...]
Hello,
it seems to fix the issue for me, the minimal testcase (lynx -dump
https://localhost:8443/) now works.
thanks, cu andreas
--
To
On 2011-08-25 Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk wrote:
[...]
A better test is to do the following against your running WWWOFFLE
server (you don't need to be online):
lynx -dump https://localhost:8443/
ok. That makes it reproducible.
gnutls-cli or openssl s_client -connect
On 2011-08-27 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2011-08-25 Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk wrote:
[...]
Another way to view the problem is to look at the libgnutls functions
that WWWOFFLE calls:
# ltrace -l /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so \
On 08/27/2011 06:58 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
I would not be surprised if upstream's response was don't do this, this
was never supposed to work but at a quick look I could not find
respective reference in the docs either.
It is a bug introduced in 2.12.x. Does the attached patch
fix
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes:
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
One thing that I noticed during the debugging of this problem is that
the newly created certificates (above) are described by certtool as
Version: 3 but the WWWOFFLE ones are Version: 1.
V1 CA
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes:
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
One thing that I noticed during the debugging of this problem is that
the newly created certificates (above) are described by certtool as
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
This is with a vanilla wwwoffle 2.9g - unmodified since released.
Looking at the list of functions I can see that there are two
gnutls_x509_*_deinit() functions called before the handshake.
Calling the first one, gnutls_x509_crt_deinit(),
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org writes:
Just to get a straightforword testcase:
(SID)root@argenau:/# DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get --purge install
wwwoffle
wwwoffled[22194] Important: WWWOFFLE Demon Version 2.9f (with ipv6,with
zlib,with gnutls) started.
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org writes:
On 2011-08-20 Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk wrote:
[...]
There seems to be a bug with gnutls on the latest Debian (version
2.12.7-6 for me). Taking the example code from the gnutls
documentation and compiling it gives me an
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
One thing that I noticed during the debugging of this problem is that
the newly created certificates (above) are described by certtool as
Version: 3 but the WWWOFFLE ones are Version: 1.
V1 CA certs should be permitted in latest GnuTLS, but
On 2011-08-20 Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk wrote:
[...]
There seems to be a bug with gnutls on the latest Debian (version
2.12.7-6 for me). Taking the example code from the gnutls
documentation and compiling it gives me an SSL server that will not
accept connections from
severity 638595 important
thanks
On 2011-08-21 jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
rename 638595 HTTPS now unusable
reassign 638595 libgnutls26
found 638595 2.12.7-6
severity 638595 critical
thanks
A == Andrew M Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk writes:
A I am having the problems as well now (I
On 2011-08-20 Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk wrote:
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
[...]
I just tested it with Linux 2.6 vs. 3.0, same bug, on both of my
computers. I suppose an upgrade to a dependency revealed the bug.
PS $ wwwoffle https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
PS Requesting:
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
Say, there also was the
segfault at 1ee45974 ip b7589e6c sp bf8f4654 error 4 in libgcrypt.so.1
But that is from a different package than gnutls...
The library libgcrypt is one of the ones that are linked in when
gnutls is used:
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/wwwoffled
rename 638595 HTTPS now unusable
reassign 638595 libgnutls26
found 638595 2.12.7-6
severity 638595 critical
thanks
A == Andrew M Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk writes:
A I am having the problems as well now (I hadn't realised it until you
A pointed it out) and I haven't changed my version of
And we find out of dynamic memory in yy_get_next_buffer in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680630
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638595
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Various truncation states are observed:
$ GET https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ | sed '$!d'
/htmlout of dynamic memory in yy_get_next_buffer()
$ GET -P https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ | sed '$!d'
$ GET https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ | sed '$!d'
$ GET -P https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ | sed '$!d'
$
severity 638595 normal
tag 638595 unreproducible
thanks
On Sat 20 Aug 2011, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
This can't just be a coincidental bug in libgcrypt11, libgnutls26, lyxn,
w3m all at the same time. It obviously is a WWWOFFLE bug.
Or your system's memory has a glitch, or whatever.
If it
PS Or your system's memory has a glitch, or whatever.
PS If it obviously a Wwwoffle bug, why have you only now discovered it? And
PS only you?
I just tested it with Linux 2.6 vs. 3.0, same bug, on both of my
computers. I suppose an upgrade to a dependency revealed the bug.
PS $ wwwoffle
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
PS Or your system's memory has a glitch, or whatever.
PS If it obviously a Wwwoffle bug, why have you only now discovered it? And
PS only you?
I just tested it with Linux 2.6 vs. 3.0, same bug, on both of my
computers. I suppose an upgrade to a dependency revealed
Say, there also was the
segfault at 1ee45974 ip b7589e6c sp bf8f4654 error 4 in libgcrypt.so.1
But that is from a different package than gnutls...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
X-debbugs-cc: wwwoffle-us...@gedanken.demon.co.uk, a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.9f-2.2
Severity: grave
This can't just be a coincidental bug in libgcrypt11, libgnutls26, lyxn,
w3m all at the same time. It obviously is a WWWOFFLE bug.
In syslog I see
kernel:
25 matches
Mail list logo
